Monday, January 10, 2005

Damned by Excellence

The later you start you education at a private school, the harder it is. Some people put their kids in private schools right from elementary schools. Others wait until high school, and yet others don’t start considering private schools until college. *There are some people who don't even look at private schools throughout their entire life, but they are not the subject of this dissertation.* The difference between private and public schools is great. Though public schools are apt to have stronger curricula in the maths and sciences, private schools more often better prepare student for the rigors of the liberal arts or college education. On the college level, once again there is a difference. Those who note it most are the students coming in from public schools. Readjusting to a new way of life dissimilar to their old school's methods of training, these students often complain that classes are hard, the expectations are great, and that they have to work and study very hard. This is often frustrating to those students who come into a private college after years of private schooling and find these "challenging and demanding" classes to be easy review. It is not fair to the students who have been better prepared to be held back by their less-prepared compatriots. Yet it is also unfair to the poorly prepared students to deny them entry or give them special consideration while they struggle to catch up with their peers. Or is it? In "Screwtape Proposes a Toast" C.S. Lewis talks about the spirit of democracy and the I’m as good as you ideology.
“In that promising land the spirit of I’m as good as you has already begun something more than a generally social influence. It begins to work itself into their educational system...The basic principle of the new education is to be that dunces and idlers must not be made to feel inferior to intelligent and industrious pupils. That would be “undemocratic.”" Is this to be the way we suppress individuals? I am saddened. At dinner tonight, a few of my friends were talking. "I hope the required curriculum classes we have this semester won't be as hard as the ones we had last semester." "Wait a minute guys!" I interjected. "Last semester's classes weren't hard. They were depressingly easy. I had so much free time. After studying all that stuff years ago, the hardest thing for me last semester was to not fall asleep in class!" “ Well that’s nice that you've studied it already!" was the retort I got. Turns out that everyone else at the table had always attended public schools, one even came from a Math/Science magnet school. Is it fair that I am to be held back while the others work to catch up to my level? Is it fair that some of them, who are obviously smarter and harder workers than me, have received such a poor preparation for college? Is it fair of the college to admit such a disparity of intellects in the first place? I dunno. I'll just do my work and get my grades, and hope to high heaven that my friends catch up and that we stop reviewing high school soon.

2 Squibs:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

From Mrs. G
The ultimate in private schooling is the home-school.
Home schooling is so superior academically that published studies have shown that home-schooled children consistently score higher than their traditionally schooled counterparts in every area. These elevated scores occur without regard to ethnicity or even if the home-schooling parent has a college degree. The individual attention afforded the home-schooled student and the interest in education represented by the personal sacrifice of the parents to home-school trump every fancy gagdet paid for by taxpayers at public schools and even out-distances the efforts of the private school sector.

In actuality, the amount of parental involvement is the lead indicator to success in the child. The more involvement and concern the parent has, the better the child will do. Ask any teacher, they will verify this. The second major indicator for success then becomes the size of the classroom and the amount of time a teacher has to spend individually with students. However, even with optimally sized traditional classrooms (16-20 students), the teacher can be rendered less effective by demands on his time by administrative duties. If the teacher is burdened with bureacratic busy work by an administration which has a need to feel productive by writing reports and conducting consensus meetings, then the teacher's time and creative enery is depleted and the school's focus turns from teaching to some other administrative agenda. Witness the enormous efforts being spent on political correctness, fairness and individual student ego. Teaching becomes secondary, while keeping the students from feeling bad about themselves becomes primary, and tests of skill, ability and work ethic become the whipping boys of the politically correct. Striving for excellence becomes the enemy, mediocrity becomes the hero and mental sludge is the result.

And don't even get me started on the wasting effects of television, video games and the sick need for immediate self-gratifiction rampant in our culture...

1/11/2005 10:28 AM  
Blogger J said...

An interesting concept and while there isn't much to say I do have to agree Peace

1/12/2005 11:45 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home